ladymetroland:

savedforslaughter:

Folks, deserts are not “empty” or “lifeless” they are often teeming with beautiful and incredible life adapted to conditions of extreme dryness. The widespread idea that deserts are lifeless or that the wildlife there isn’t important is something that businesses of all types (mining companies, housing developers— especially true here in AZ— and even commercial farmers) take advantage of this in order to continue exploiting desert habitats.

I don’t know if this is true for America, but in Australia this is absolutely also tied to the repeated disenfranchisement of aboriginal people. Example: when we’re taught about the Maralinga nuclear tests the area is described as barren and devoid of life. It was not. There had been a mission there, and there was still a large aboriginal community living in the area, but playing on the idea that everything inland of Mount Gambier is a barren wasteland made it easier to pretend that, if it hadn’t been for two men giving the people living there about an hour’s notice, this country would have vapourised an entire community of people.

Everyone knows nothing can live in the desert, ergo the large groups of people who still live there can’t exist. So we can sell it for mining rights and none of the white people living on the coast will even hear about it.

asecualhand:

xneferpitou:

0l0x:

2018 Grinch has no edge. He’s got no bite. He’s not even that much of an asshole. He’s just a sassy gay furry with unusually nice teeth despite his famous theme song declaring otherwise.

1966 Grinch? Now that was a mean, scary bastard. He was a crusty old fuck who hated society so much that he only came off his shitty frozen mountain to commit crimes and terrorism out of spite.

Bennyhoo Cumberland Grinch comes down from his mountain to buy groceries.

You can round the edges off a character to make them more “relatable” or whatever, but you also run the risk of losing what defined them in the first place. The end result is bland and generic.

2018 Grinch is a reflection of modern society’s rejection of real character flaws in the interest of being “unproblematic” and in this essay i will

What was your opinion on the Jim Carrey grinch?

Jim Carrey Grinch said bitch, ate glass and threw a whole child in the garbage. He is an absolute champ and the only rightful heir to the throne.

Disney Princesses In Accurate Period Costume.

thedomesticcurl:

dragonsrequiem:

gehayi:

toxicphox:

butts-with-bro-shades:

mitunas-wife:

hellfirehotchkiss:

sheltymops:

image

SLEEPING BEAUTY (1485).

image

POCAHONTAS (17TH CENTURY POWAHTAN). 

image

CINDERELLA (MID 1860’S)

image

JASMINE (PRE-ISLAMIC MIDDLE EAST)

image

SNOW WHITE (16TH CENTURY GERMANY).

image

ARIEL (1890’S)

image

BELLE (1770’S FRENCH COURT FASHION).

CLARIE HUMMEL

image

Megara (Ancient Greece)

image

Mulan (Ancient China)

image

Tiana (1920’s)

image

Rapunzel (18th Century)

I’ve reblogged this 6 times probably

You all always forget her excellent Maid Marian

image

Hey, you forgot Shoomlah’s updated version of Pocahontas:

Shoomlah said: 

Finally updated Pocahontas! I don’t think this is what people were expecting as the next entry in the series, but some of the criticisms of my first design have been eating away at me for years now and I needed to get off my ass and address them.

So hey! Spunky age-appropriate Pocahontas/Matoaka, sans feathers in the hair/European imagery/other superfluous details. This is closer to accounts and illustrations of Powhatan dress from the period, and I kinda think it’s closer to the Disney design anyway. WIN/WIN.

Thanks to everyone who’s educated my ass over the past couple of years, including moniquill, apihtawikosisan, this-is-not-native, and numerous others. You’ve made me a way more thoughtful artist in the process.

Reblogging bc I loveloveloveloveloveloveLOVE the updated Pocahontas. Too many people sexualize her. Major props for taking the time and care to fix this!

Re blogging for the updated Pocahontas